<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Windley's Technometria - Latest Comments in Is Office 2007 a Pig or What?</title><link>http://windley.disqus.com/</link><description>Organizations Get the IT They Deserve!</description><atom:link href="https://windley.disqus.com/is_office_2007_a_pig_or_what/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:13:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Office 2007 a Pig or What?</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/04/is_office_2007_a_pig_or_what.shtml#comment-348979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I couldn't agree more. I've had several blurbs while running it, and the incompatibility is annoying. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate Nead</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:13:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Office 2007 a Pig or What?</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/04/is_office_2007_a_pig_or_what.shtml#comment-307200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why pay for MS Office if you can run NeoOffice for free?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:41:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Office 2007 a Pig or What?</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/04/is_office_2007_a_pig_or_what.shtml#comment-303070</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Windley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:01:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Office 2007 a Pig or What?</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/04/is_office_2007_a_pig_or_what.shtml#comment-303047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was about to complaint about the same thing, I feel that Office 2004 for Mac is way faster than the New Office 2008. I'm a blogger and I use MS Word a lot because of the Spelling feature, as English is my second language. I haven't been able to find any other tool that spell check as good as MS Word, therefore I'm stock.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LwEEs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:49:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Office 2007 a Pig or What?</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/04/is_office_2007_a_pig_or_what.shtml#comment-302867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Office 2008 is a fat, ugly pig... It must be written in Java and not objective C. ;)   I use iWorks '08 to read and write most all the *.doc's, *.xls, and *.ppt's I get and produce.  I just use Office 2008 to convert the occasional, bloated Office 2007/XML file to its older office format.  If someone writes a nice converter/filter or iWorks starts reading the Office 2007 format then my Office 2008 will be removed from my system and the media will be burned so no one else will have to suffer from it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stacey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:35:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Office 2007 a Pig or What?</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/04/is_office_2007_a_pig_or_what.shtml#comment-301350</link><description></description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Windley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:03:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Office 2007 a Pig or What?</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/04/is_office_2007_a_pig_or_what.shtml#comment-301182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not trying to convince you differently.  And I acknowledge that people I know are having the same kind of complaints as you. I think that sucks.  All I was trying to say is that some folk -- such as myself (and others I know)  -- don't see the same problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am not trying to defend MS on this one, nor am I suggesting you give Office 2008 another try, I was just trying to say that the issue is weirder then people realize.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jockm</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:27:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Office 2007 a Pig or What?</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/04/is_office_2007_a_pig_or_what.shtml#comment-300411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see no appreciable difference in speed.  Last night, I was even  &lt;br&gt;watching memory to make sure it wasn't a memory issue.  There was  &lt;br&gt;still plenty left (and I should say that I think Office 2008 *is*  &lt;br&gt;better with memory).  That said, it's still slow.  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Windley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:20:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Office 2007 a Pig or What?</title><link>http://www.windley.com/archives/2008/04/is_office_2007_a_pig_or_what.shtml#comment-299867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its Office 2008 on OS X, just to call it by it's name.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suspect this may be a YMMV, you aren't the first person I have heard make complaints like this; but I haven't experienced anything like this.  I have been using it for a bit now, and while it doesn't feel an order of magnitude faster than the PPC version it is 2-3 times faster for me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However with Parallels integration into the finder, so you can have Office docs automatically open in Windows; it isn't a bad option either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jockm</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:24:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>